Mail slow? View this month’s issue, right online!
Our digital version is easy to share with colleagues. See this month’s issue and digital versions of previous issues too.
Get your products and services in front of thousands of decision-makers. View our print and online advertising options.
A one-on-one interview conducted by our editorial team with industry leaders in our market.
Discover the newest promotions and collaborations within the industry.
Easy-to-digest data for your business.
Shampoos, conditioners, colorants and styling products created by leading industry suppliers.
Creams, serums, facial cleansers and more created by leading suppliers to the skincare industry.
Detergents, fabric softeners and more created by leading suppliers to the fabric care industry.
Eyeshadows, lipsticks, foundations and more created by leading suppliers to the color cosmetics industry.
Bodywashes, and bar and liquid soaps created by leading suppliers to the personal cleanser industry.
Hard surface cleaners, disinfectants and more created by leading suppliers to the home care industry.
Eau de parfums and eau de toilettes, body sprays, mists and more created by leading suppliers to the fragrance industry.
UV lotions and creams, self-tanners and after-sun products created by leading suppliers to the suncare industry.
A detailed look at the leading US players in the global household and personal products industry.
A detailed look at the leading players outside the US in the global household and personal products industry.
Looking for a new raw material or packaging component supplier? Your search starts here.
When you need a new manufacturing partner or private label company, get started here.
Who owns that? To keep track of leading brands and their owners, click here.
An annual publication, Company Profiles features leading industry suppliers with information about markets served, products, technologies and services for beauty, pesonal care and home care.
New products and technologies from some of the brightest minds in the industry.
A one-on-one video interview between our editorial teams and industry leaders.
Listen to the leading experts in the global household and personal products industry.
Comprehensive coverage of key topics selected by sponsors.
Detailed research on novel ingredients and other solutions for the global household and personal care industry.
Company experts explain what works and why.
Exclusive content created by our affiliates and partners for the household and personal care industry.
Exciting news releases from the household and personal care industry.
Our targeted webinars provide relevant market information in an interactive format to audiences around the globe.
Discover exclusive live streams and updates from the hottest events and shows.
Looking for a job in the household and personal care industry, search no further.
Follow these steps to get your article published in print or online
What are you searching for?
Unit dose formats have provided a shot in the arm for the laundry detergent industry, but issues remain.
January 6, 2015
By: TOM BRANNA
Editor
There’s no doubt that unit dose technology makes it easier for consumers to do laundry. No measuring, no mixing, no laundry room alchemy of any kind. Similarly, the technology has provided a lift to older and handicapped consumers who find it difficult if not downright impossible to lug a jug to the laundry room or down into the basement. Whether young or old, it’s clear that consumers love the convenience inherent to the unit dose format. Sales of Pods, Pacs, Flings and the like soared nearly 26% to more than $796 million in supermarkets, drugstores, mass market retailers, military commissaries and select club and dollar retail chains for the 52 weeks ended Nov. 2, 2014, according to Infoscan Reviews, IRI (see chart). “Price and convenience continue to be deciding factors for laundry detergent,” explained Anne Candido, fabric care communications, P&G. “Consumers value the fool-proof, all-in-one idea of unit dose.” When it comes to a convenient way to do laundry, there is bifurcation in the market, agreed Ed Vlacich, executive VP-national brands, Sun Products. He noted that even cash-strapped consumers want to purchase higher cost-per-load innovations like unit dose detergent packs. “They see the value of getting something clean the first time, and the convenience that packs provide. Plus, there’s the cache of knowing that they have the latest innovation in their laundry basket.” Some Forms Suffer Unfortunately, gains made in unit dose haven’t carried over to the entire laundry care category. For the same period, total category sales dropped 2.6% to about $6.8 billion, according to IRI. Taking a closer look at product formats, liquid laundry and liquid fabric softener sales each declined more than 3%, and their poor cousin powder continued its precipitous sales decline, tumbling 14% to a tad below $870 million. “We see polarization (in the laundry category), with pods doing well,” observed Ian Bell, Euromonitor International. Bell pointed out that private label isn’t doing as well as one might expect in a value-based market. He attributes that with big players coming with a value proposition of their own. For example, he noted that P&G’s value-priced Tide Simply Clean and Fresh bears a striking resemblance to Church & Dwight’s Arm & Hammer brand. According to IRI, Church & Dwight is on the only top five player in food, drug and mass to eke out a gain in the liquid laundry category, with a .55% increase for the 52 weeks ended Nov. 2, 2014. The category has been battered by price wars that have eroded overall sales and ultimately could impact innovation. “It is tougher than it’s ever been,” insisted Vlacich. “It’s been very competitive during the past year and the category has been heavily discounted.” He noted that through mid-October 2014, the category was flooded with more than $10 billion worth of coupons, an increase of 17% over the previous year. More than $7 billion of that came from just two brands, Vlacich added. Harried & Worried “The economic landscape has certainly impacted home care and all CPG categories,” agreed Steve Johnson of Information Resources, Inc., who spoke at the Cleaning Products 2014 Conference. Although the Great Recession was followed by several years filled with positive economic momentum; i.e., rising stock prices and falling unemployment rates, about 40% of US households feel challenged by today’s economy—heck, even 30% of households with incomes of $100,000 or more feel stressed about the economy. Johnson expects economic concerns and consumer stress will continue through 2020 and, as a result, he predicted that gains can be made in the underdeveloped private label segment of the laundry care category. He pointed out that while private label commands 17.6% of total store sales, it accounts for just 7.7% of home care sales (vs. 22.1% for general merchandise and 23.6% for health care sales). More specifically, private label accounts for just 2.5% of liquid laundry detergent sales and 4.0% of fabric softener sales. Even worse, sales of private label liquid laundry detergent slid more than 12%, according to IRI data. On the flip side, private label represents the fastest growing segment in the home care sector, with a compound annual growth rate of 4.6% vs. 2.8% for the total store; bleach and fabric softener sheets are two of the best performing product types within home care private label. If that news wasn’t bad enough for national brands, Johnson noted that one of the biggest beneficiaries of the move to private label just happens to be the biggest retailer on the planet. In fact, Walmart and Sam’s Club private label sales have posted 12% CAGRs since 2011, while all other retailers report an 0.7% decline. Do these statistics spell doom for national brands? Not at all, insisted Johnson. “Brands are bringing value to consumers in fundamentally different ways,” he said, noting the success of products such as P&G’s Tide Pods and Downy Unstopables. Johnson pointed out that brands can bring value not based on price, by offering multipurpose and/or sustainable solutions. “Innovations that work deliver on three key trends,” he explained. “Simplicity, wellness and excitement.” On Target The retail landscape is littered with losers—think Sears, Best Buys and Staples—all of which have been unable to adapt to changing consumer tastes and values. And while it’s had its share of missteps over the years with shopper identity theft and a poor online presence, Target remains a leader in the private label space through its Up & Up brand, which is available in more than 50 categories including laundry care. According to Tom Flicker, principal product engineer, Up & Up, the brand helps drive consumers to Target, while boosting sales and earnings. “Guests (customers) love them,” insisted Flicker, who noted that Target has 20 own brands and that Up & Up does $2 billion in sales on its own. “Target sees private label and national brands as working together to drive business,” explained Flicker. “We need national brands to grow the categories as we grow our brands.” He explained that when it comes to product development, Target develops the product first, considers the cost second and tests products just like national brands. “If we can’t exceed a national brand then we don’t launch it,” Flicker maintained. “If an Up & Up diaper leaks, then we know the consumer won’t buy our trash bags (or other private label products).” Consumer research convinced Target to develop products that stand out from the competition. “If our products are too similar to national brands, then consumers don’t see us,” he explained. And while Flicker acknowledged that national brands own the laundry detergent aisle, that didn’t stop Target from developing Up & Up laundry detergents after extensive research that included asking test subjects to keep diaries on tough stains. “Target guests have different kinds of stains,” he maintained. The Tide Turns One of the reasons why private label has had such a tough time making headway against national brands is because Tide, Gain and the rest do such a good job of protecting their turf from imitators. “The laundry market continues to be highly competitive,” agreed Candido. “Tide will continue to compete by offering the consumer value added innovation that truly delivers.” For example, P&G is rolling out an Unstopables megabrand in January 2015 that will include a suite of home care products to join the in-wash scent booster, and the following month, Tide will introduced a new pod innovation. Meanwhile, P&G will introduce a new fragrance variant, Botanical Mist, to its Infusions line. Candido noted that the category continues to be highly competitive due to promotion activities. However, Tide is growing share and household penetration. Vlacich predicts that consumers will return to national brands as oil and gas prices continue to drop throughout the US. And Sun’s All brand will reap the benefit. In a 2014 Consumer Reports’ study, All Mighty Pacs provided the best performance among single-dose laundry detergents, according to the Sun executive. “It’s been a great year for innovation for us,” insisted Vlacich. “We had a couple of new products that reinforced our reputation for innovation.” One of them was All Free Clear ultra fabric softener for sensitive skin. It is the No. 1 detergent brand recommended by dermatologists. Another is All Small & Mighty Superconcentrated, which provides 30% more loads than the old formula. Finally, Sun introduced Snuggle Scent Booster in two fragrance variants. The unit dose format combines convenience with two fragrance options. Ready to Wear? If grass and food stains aren’t enough for formulators and suppliers to worry about, Kim Scheffler, director of garment development, Adidas, warns that the next generation of active wear—commonly called smart garments—may have as many wires, processors and modems as a cellphone. There are already heatable garments from companies such as WarmX; clothing to monitor heart rates, such as Fibretronic’s ConnectedWear; and even illuminated hoodies, shirts, skirts and jackets from a variety of designers and clothing companies. More advanced garments obtain a signal from the body, rely on electronics to move data around and transform it into information and include interfaces to share the results with users. High-tech clothing, for sure, but they create unique problems for Adidas researchers and ultimately, the fabric care industry. “There is a lot of corrosiveness in sweat,” explained Scheffler. “Durability and washability remain barriers to smart garments.” She’s asking for industry to come up with answers to several questions, including:
Enter the destination URL
Or link to existing content
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !